GenAI and Copilot use-case discovery
Clarify the people, decisions, information, workflow, and governance around a candidate use case.
Possible outputs
- Prioritized use-case frame
- Value and risk questions
- Practical next-step recommendation
Focused advisory for teams exploring GenAI, Microsoft Copilot, Copilot Studio, Power Platform, and workflow automation without pretending every problem needs an agent.
Fit
You have a business workflow in mind but need to separate the useful use case from the fashionable one.
You need a low-code prototype direction before committing to a larger implementation.
Your team needs a practical workshop grounded in its real decisions and constraints.
You need an independent way to map automation opportunities, risks, dependencies, and next steps.
Engagements
Bounded engagements with visible outputs. Pricing follows scope.
Clarify the people, decisions, information, workflow, and governance around a candidate use case.
Shape a bounded prototype that can test the workflow and learning assumptions before a larger build.
Inspect the current workflow, handoffs, data, exception paths, and automation fit.
Create a clear learning experience around Copilot, agents, low code, or practical AI adoption.
Working approach
Start with the actual workflow, audience, constraints, and decision, not a preselected technology.
Use maps, examples, and clear assumptions so everyone can understand and discuss the recommendation.
Close with decisions, risks, owners, and a practical sequence rather than an open-ended transformation promise.
Examples
Explore projects across low-code apps, team automation, and research.
A personal low-code learning build that submits leave requests, routes manager approvals with Power Automate, and tracks status in SharePoint.
A team-built UiPath automation for checking US COVID-19 vaccine availability and locating vaccination centers by postal code.
A 2021 research-internship project assessing factors affecting electric-vehicle feasibility and adoption in India.
Confidentiality boundary
The examples on this site focus on personal, research, and team projects. Keep an initial inquiry high level; detailed or confidential material can wait for the right conversation.
No. Scope, format, timing, and the right working model are established through inquiry before pricing is discussed.
No. Discovery, assessment, prototype advisory, and enablement can stand alone. The recommendation should fit the problem.
Yes, when shared understanding is the immediate need. The workshop should still be tied to the team’s decisions and follow-through.
Next step
Start with the situation, audience, constraints, and decision you need to make.